You can sponsor this page

Oxynoemacheilus arsaniasus Freyhof, Kaya, Turan & Geiger, 2019

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Oxynoemacheilus arsaniasus
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Nemacheilidae.

Classification / Names Common names | Synonyms | Catalog of Fishes(genus, species) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei (teleosts) > Cypriniformes (Carps) > Nemacheilidae (Brook loaches)
Etymology: arsaniasus: Named for the Arsanias, the antique name of the Murat River; an adjective.

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecology

Freshwater; demersal. Subtropical

Distribution Countries | FAO areas | Ecosystems | Occurrences | Point map | Introductions | Faunafri

Asia: Turkey.

Size / Weight / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 9.7 cm SL male/unsexed; (Ref. 120397)

Short description Identification keys | Morphology | Morphometrics

This species is distinguished from O. ercisianus by having a central pore in the supratemporal canal (vs. absent); a bold, dark-brown bar or vertically elongated blotch at the caudal fin-base, usually M-shaped or fused with a roundish or vertically elongate, dark-brown blotch at the vertical midline (vs. a mottled pigmentation not different from the flank pattern); usually with wide, dark-brown, bold bands on the caudal fin (vs. narrow, pale-brown, indistinct); no or a shallow dorsal and ventral adipose crest in individuals larger than 50 mm SL (vs. a short and high crest); longer and more slender caudal peduncle (caudal peduncle length 1.3-1.6 times its depth vs. 1.0-1.3); eye is larger with eye diameter 19-30% HL (vs. 14-19); a short prepelvic length, 48-53% SL (vs. 52-57). It differs from O. hazarensis by the absence of suborbital groove in the male (vs. present); no scales on caudal peduncle (vs. present); shorter outer rostral barbel 22-34% HL (vs. 34-41); shorter maxillary barbel 24-30% HL (vs. 32-40). It differs from O. kaynaki by having an incomplete lateral line (vs. complete); no scales on flank (vs. present); no pelvic axillary lobe (vs. present); absence or with a short dorsal adipose crest on the caudal peduncle (vs. a long adipose ridge). It differs from O. tigris by having no scales on the flank (vs. present, usually isolated and deeply embedded); with a bold, dark-brown bar or a vertically elongated blotch on the caudal-fin-base or a bar fused with a roundish or vertically elongate, dark-brown blotch at the vertical midline (vs. 2 bold, black spots in most individuals, no pigmentation in others); no or a short dorsal-adipose crest on caudal peduncle not reaching to the vertical through the anal-fin base (vs. long adipose crest reaching beyond the anal-fin origin, usually below the last dorsal-fin rays when folded down); with a more slender caudal-peduncle, caudal peduncle length 1.3-1.6 times its depth (vs. 0.9-1.2). This species is further distinguished from its congeners inhabiting the Euphrates drainage not belonging to the O. tigris species group by a combination of characters: it differs from O. araxensis by having an incomplete lateral line (vs. complete) and males without a suborbital groove (vs. present); differs from O. argyrogramma, O. bergianus, O. euphraticus, O. samanticus by the incomplete lateral line (vs. complete), a slightly emarginated caudal fin (vs. deeply emarginate or slightly forked), suborbital groove in the male absent (vs. present), and no black spots at the caudal-fin base (vs. having two bold black jet spots in O. argyrogramma, O. euphraticus); differs from O. paucilepis by having an incomplete lateral line (vs. complete) and no scales (vs. flank covered by isolated scales) (Ref. 120397).

Biology     Glossary (e.g. epibenthic)

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturity | Reproduction | Spawning | Eggs | Fecundity | Larvae

Main reference Upload your references | References | Coordinator | Collaborators

Freyhof, J., C. Kaya, D. Turan and M. Geiger, 2019. Review of the Oxynoemacheilus tigris group with the description of two new species from the Euphrates drainage (Teleostei: Nemacheilidae). Zootaxa 4612(1):29-57. (Ref. 120397)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435: Version 2024-2)


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

Fisheries: of no interest
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

More information

Trophic ecology
Food items
Diet composition
Food consumption
Food rations
Predators
Ecology
Ecology
Population dynamics
Growth parameters
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversion
Recruitment
Abundance
Life cycle
Reproduction
Maturity
Maturity/Gills rel.
Fecundity
Spawning
Spawning aggregations
Eggs
Egg development
Larvae
Larval dynamics
Distribution
Countries
FAO areas
Ecosystems
Occurrences
Introductions
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill area
Brain
Otolith
Physiology
Body composition
Nutrients
Oxygen consumption
Swimming type
Swimming speed
Visual pigments
Fish sound
Diseases & Parasites
Toxicity (LC50s)
Genetics
Genetics
Heterozygosity
Heritability
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Aquaculture profiles
Strains
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Collaborators
Taxonomy
Common names
Synonyms
Morphology
Morphometrics
Pictures
References
References

Tools

Special reports

Download XML

Internet sources

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: genus, species | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | National databases | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Tree of Life | Wikipedia: Go, Search | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Zoological Record

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = No PD50 data   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.00741 (0.00354 - 0.01554), b=3.02 (2.85 - 3.19), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this Genus-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Trophic level (Ref. 69278):  2.7   ±0.3 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resilience (Ref. 120179):  Medium, minimum population doubling time 1.4 - 4.4 years (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100).