You can sponsor this page

Serrapinnus zanatae Jerep, Camelier & Malabarba, 2016

Upload your photos and videos
Google image
Image of Serrapinnus zanatae
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Characidae.

Classification / Names Common names | Synonyms | Catalog of Fishes(genus, species) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei (teleosts) > Characiformes (Characins) > Characidae (Characins; tetras) > Cheirodontinae
Etymology: Serrapinnus: Latin, serran, serranus, saw and a fish of genus Serranus + Latin, pinna = spiny, thorn (Ref. 45335)zanatae: Named zanatae in honor to Angela Maria Zanata, due to her contribution to our knowledge of Neotropical freshwater fishes, and for collecting the new species. A noun in genitive.
Eponymy: Dr Angela Maria Zanata is a zoologist and ichthyologist at the Federal University of Bahia, Brazil (2007). [...] (Ref. 128868), visit book page.

Environment: milieu / climate zone / depth range / distribution range Ecology

Freshwater; benthopelagic. Tropical

Distribution Countries | FAO areas | Ecosystems | Occurrences | Point map | Introductions | Faunafri

South America: currently known to inhabit the upper and middle portions of the rio Jequitinhonha basin, Minas Gerais State, southeastern region of Brazil (Ref. 119705).

Size / Weight / Age

Maturity: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 3.9 cm SL male/unsexed; (Ref. 119705)

Short description Identification keys | Morphology | Morphometrics

Dorsal soft rays (total): 10 - 11; Anal soft rays: 19 - 23. Serrapinnus zanatae is distinguished from its congeners by the following characters: premaxillary teeth with 7-9 cusps (vs. 10-12 cusps in S. gracilis and S. littoris, and 3-5 cusps in S. microdon and S. potiguar; spatulate and parallel ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. scimitar-shaped procurrent caudal-fin rays arranged in a semi-circle in S. aster and S. potiguar); incomplete lateral line (vs. complete lateral line in S. heterodon, sometimes also complete in S. sterbai and S. tocantinensis; dorsal fin without markings (vs. black pigmentation on the anterior and proximal border of the dorsal fin in S. notomelas and a faint black blotch on the distal half of the dorsal fin in S. microdon and S. heterodon); dark longitudinal stripe extending from the region below the dorsal fin to the caudal peduncle (vs. dark longitudinal stripe extending from the region anterior to the pseudotympanum to the caudal peduncle in S. sterbai); abdomen without distinctive marks ( vs. abdomen with a black spot on the posteroventral region in S. kriegi); absence of fins rays extended as filaments (vs. unbranched dorsal-, pelvic- and anal-fin rays extended as filaments in mature males in S. tocantinensis); 11-13 ventral procurrent caudal-fin rays (vs. 13-16 in S. calliurus, 14-16 in S. kriegi, 17-19 in S. lucindai, and 13-16 in S. micropterus); 16-19 branched anal-fin rays (vs. 19-22 in S. calliurus); 33-36 scales on longitudinal series (vs. 31-32 in S. micropterus); caudal-fin spot oval and horizontally elongated not extending to dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle (vs. caudal spot usually lozenge, vertically elongated, reaching the dorsal and ventral margins of the caudal peduncle in S. calliurus and S. piaba (Ref. 119705)).

Biology     Glossary (e.g. epibenthic)

Life cycle and mating behavior Maturity | Reproduction | Spawning | Eggs | Fecundity | Larvae

Main reference Upload your references | References | Coordinator | Collaborators

Jerep, F.C., P. Camelier and L.R. Malabarba, 2016. Serrapinnus zanatae, a new species from the rio Jequitinhonha basin, Minas Gerais State, Brazil (Teleostei: Characidae: Cheirodontinae). Ichthyol. Explor. Freshwat. 26(4):289-298. (Ref. 119705)

IUCN Red List Status (Ref. 130435: Version 2024-1)


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Threat to humans

  Harmless





Human uses

Fisheries: of no interest
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

More information

Trophic ecology
Food items
Diet composition
Food consumption
Food rations
Predators
Ecology
Ecology
Population dynamics
Growth parameters
Max. ages / sizes
Length-weight rel.
Length-length rel.
Length-frequencies
Mass conversion
Recruitment
Abundance
Life cycle
Reproduction
Maturity
Maturity/Gills rel.
Fecundity
Spawning
Spawning aggregations
Eggs
Egg development
Larvae
Larval dynamics
Distribution
Countries
FAO areas
Ecosystems
Occurrences
Introductions
BRUVS - Videos
Anatomy
Gill area
Brain
Otolith
Physiology
Body composition
Nutrients
Oxygen consumption
Swimming type
Swimming speed
Visual pigments
Fish sound
Diseases & Parasites
Toxicity (LC50s)
Genetics
Genetics
Heterozygosity
Heritability
Human related
Aquaculture systems
Aquaculture profiles
Strains
Ciguatera cases
Stamps, coins, misc.
Outreach
Collaborators
Taxonomy
Common names
Synonyms
Morphology
Morphometrics
Pictures
References
References

Tools

Special reports

Download XML

Internet sources

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | BOLDSystems | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: genus, species | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GenBank: genome, nucleotide | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | MitoFish | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | Tree of Life | Wikipedia: Go, Search | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Zoological Record

Estimates based on models

Phylogenetic diversity index (Ref. 82804):  PD50 = 0.5001   [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight: a=0.01122 (0.00461 - 0.02730), b=3.08 (2.89 - 3.27), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this Genus-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Trophic level (Ref. 69278):  2.5   ±0.5 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resilience (Ref. 120179):  High, minimum population doubling time less than 15 months (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Fishing Vulnerability (Ref. 59153):  Low vulnerability (10 of 100).